Building autonomy in the workplace: Tips for software engineering managers

Managing a software engineering team sometimes feels like walking a tightrope. On one side, you want to focus on empowering team members and fostering autonomy so they can innovate and take ownership. 

On the other side, deadlines, quality standards, and risks mean you need to maintain a certain level of control.

Lean too far one way, and things fall apart; lean too far the other, and you’re the dreaded micromanager. How do you find that sweet spot where your team gets enough guidance without feeling stifled?

Let’s explore what really works, drawing from research and real-world tech examples (including Google and Spotify). We’ll provide practical delegation tips and look at setting guardrails instead of roadblocks, managing risk while encouraging innovation, and building trust through measured control. Ok, let’s hash this out—manager to manager.

As an engineering manager, your job isn’t to control every move but to create an environment where the team can move fast without veering off the cliff. Think of guardrails on a highway—they keep cars on track but don’t dictate exactly how you drive. 

In the same way, effective managers provide clear boundaries and context (the guardrails) but avoid unnecessary rules or checkpoints that become roadblocks.

In practical terms, guardrails might be things like coding standards, clear objectives, and core values the team aligns on. These ensure stability and prevent chaos. But within those boundaries, engineers should have the freedom to choose their implementation, explore creative solutions, and even make a few mistakes. 

Tech culture exemplifies this guardrails mindset. For example, Google is known for giving teams big-picture goals through OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) and a shared vision, then letting them figure out the how. 

Google’s own re:Work guide notes that after setting audacious goals, great managers “get out of the way and let employees figure out the best way to achieve them,” intervening only with advice if needed​. 

For a manager, here’s the takeaway: Be clear about the why and the what, but be flexible about the how.

Set some ground rules. But avoid the temptation to prescribe every step or add approval layers for every little thing. Those become roadblocks that frustrate developers and slow down progress. By trusting the team within well-defined boundaries, you create a space where they can drive forward at full speed, knowing you’ve got the edges covered.

Innovation is the lifeblood of tech teams. We’re always chasing the next optimization or bold idea. But with innovation comes risk. 

As a manager, how do you encourage your engineers to take smart risks and try new ideas, without letting the project (or your entire production environment) burst into flames? 

It’s a tough balance: You need to encourage experimentation so you don’t stagnate. But you must manage risk so failures aren’t catastrophic.

First, let’s talk about creating a climate where it’s safe to take risks. This goes hand-in-hand with fostering innovation. If engineers are afraid a failed experiment will get them blamed or punished, they’ll stop trying new things.

According to one Amy Edmondson study, executives said only 2–5% of failures were truly blameworthy, yet 70–90% of failures were still treated as blameworthy in their companies​. That’s a huge gap. It shows that many companies talk about innovation but punish failure in practice, killing creativity in the process. Don’t be that company—or that manager.

Instead, normalize the possibility of failure. “What’s our failure budget?” is a question some forward-thinking teams ask. 

For example, Spotify holds informal “Fail Fika” gatherings for the team to chat about, and even celebrate, recent failures​. (Fika is Swedish for coffee break.) Celebrating failure sounds a bit odd, but this practice sends a clear message: We learn from mistakes here; we don’t hide them.

Consider these strategies to empower autonomy in your engineering team.

• Hackathons or 20% time: Give developers dedicated time for passion projects or experiments. Google’s famous 20% time policy gave employees one day a week for side projects. Not every idea succeeded, but it led to game-changers like Gmail​. When people know they have space to tinker, amazing ideas can emerge.

• Pilot projects and feature flags: Let the team release new features to a subset of users or an internal beta. If it flops, the impact is limited, and you can iterate or roll it back. Facebook embraced a “move fast and break things” mentality by pushing code daily, accepting some bugs, and quickly implementing fixes. 

• Two-way door decisions: Not every decision is irreversible. Amazon’s Jeff Bezos popularized the idea of Type 1 and Type 2 decisions. If a decision is like a two-way door, it’s reversible. Let the team make it quickly and cheaply, and if it fails, they can back out​. Save your heavy managerial oversight for the one-way door decisions that are hard to undo. This approach encourages innovation because the team isn’t paralyzed by fear for every decision.

Bottom line: Make sure your team feels safe to innovate. Encourage that crazy idea prototype. Support the engineer who wants to try a different approach to a problem. 

Also help them think through how to test cheaply, mitigate potential harm, and ensure there’s always a learning follow-up. When people feel safe, they give their best ideas—and that’s when the magic happens.

How much control is too much? How much autonomy is too much? Striking the right balance is the classic Goldilocks dilemma for engineering managers. Too controlling and you smother motivation and creativity. Too hands-off and you might end up with chaos. 

The sweet spot is somewhere in between, but it’s not a fixed point. It can vary by team, by individual, or even by project phase.

It helps to understand the extremes. In one extreme scenario, a manager dictates every decision, big or small. The team has low autonomy and also low understanding of the bigger picture (low alignment). 

This is basically micromanagement hell: Developers feel like code monkeys and often aren’t sure why they’re doing what they’re told to do​. Morale tanks, and paradoxically, work doesn’t improve—it gets worse. 

As an industry survey noted, 71% of workers said micromanagement interfered with their performance, and 85% said it hurt their morale​. No surprise that nearly 3 in 4 employees see micromanaging as the biggest red flag in a workplace. Yikes!

On the opposite extreme, imagine a manager who provides almost no direction: “Do whatever you want, I trust you.” 

High autonomy sounds nice in theory, but if it comes with low alignment (no common vision or standards), you get chaos. Each engineer might go off in a different direction, build modules that don’t integrate, or choose conflicting tech stacks—a recipe for a fragmented product​.

So, what’s the right mix? The ideal often cited is high alignment and high autonomy. That means everyone is crystal clear on goals, context, and constraints (alignment), and within that, they have freedom to choose the best path (autonomy). 

In a high alignment and high autonomy culture, “the leader’s job is to communicate what problem needs to be solved and why.” Then the teams collaborate on how to solve it​.

In summary, aim for that high alignment/high autonomy zone by relentlessly communicating purpose and context. It’s a balancing act. You’ll wobble sometimes, but with practice, you’ll get better at feeling out the right level of involvement for your team’s needs.

Many new engineering managers struggle with delegation. You might feel you can do something faster or better, or you worry about burdening people. But effective delegation is the cornerstone of team autonomy.

It’s how you scale and grow your team’s capabilities. So, let’s talk about practical tactics for delegating authority in a way that empowers your developers and doesn’t leave you with nasty surprises.

Delegation is not throwing tasks over the fence; it’s entrusting ownership of a result. Be very clear about what outcome or goal you’re delegating and why it matters. 

For example, don’t say, “Handle the database migration.” Say, “You’re in charge of migrating the database to X version with zero downtime. It’s critical because our service level agreements can’t afford an outage.” 

Clarity on success criteria is the guardrail that ensures your team member knows what to aim for. If you just assign a task list, they’ll do the minimum. But if you entrust them with a goal and context, they’ll rise to it​.

When you delegate something, provide all the relevant information and resources. Who are the stakeholders? What are the constraints? Share any background docs, introduce them to contacts who can help and clarify the decision boundaries. 

By front-loading context, you minimize the need to step in later. Resist the urge to micromanage. Avoid constant check-ins. Instead, set a periodic touchpoint (like a weekly sync or a Slack update) and make it clear they own the day-to-day. 

One common mistake is giving someone responsibility for a result but not actually giving them the authority to make the decisions to get there. This is frustrating for them and still burdensome for you. 

If you make an engineer the Tech Lead for a new feature, let them lead. Perhaps they get to choose the implementation approach, coordinate tasks, and be the point person with QA. Publicly signal their authority to others.

When your team member achieves a win, give them the spotlight. In team meetings or email updates to higher-ups, highlight their work. For example, you might say something like, “Jane led this refactor and it improved load times by 30%.” This builds their confidence and shows the whole team that delegation leads to growth. 

In short: Set your team up for success and let them run. It frees you up to focus on higher-level priorities, and it develops your team’s skills. It’s a true win-win.

At the heart of the autonomy vs. control issue is one word: Trust. If you trust your team, you’ll give them autonomy. If they trust you, they’ll accept the guidance you put in place. 

Building that mutual trust is perhaps a manager’s most important job. When trust is high, everything else gets easier. In fact, a study in the Harvard Business Review found that people at high-trust companies had 50% higher productivity and 76% more engagement compared to low-trust companies.

Finding the right balance between team autonomy and managerial control is a journey. You’ll fine-tune it with each new team member and project. Remember: Autonomy and control aren’t opposites. They’re complements. 

With the right guardrails in place, greater autonomy becomes not only possible but highly productive. Give people freedom and purpose, and they deliver fantastic results.

Uncover more key skills for tech leadership and software engineering tips for managers.